The final grade will be based on:
<br><br>1. Advisors recommendations. For an adequate tracking of the project development, advisors will request different pieces of evidence, both oral and/or written, including partial and/or final reports. Each pair of advisors must submit a justified recommendation to the committee as to the team work methodology and the performance of the team members in the accomplishment of the project goals.
<br>Competences A1, A6, A7, A8, A9, B2, B3, A63, A64, A65, A66 will be evaluated here.
<br><br>2. The commitee evaluation of the final oral presentation, including the Q&A period. The students must also submit complementary material at least three days in advance (report, slides or any other) to help assess their work. The members of the evaluation committe will be the instructors of the Type-A ECTS, as long as they are not involved in the supervision of any project. Otherwise, additional assistance for the evaluation of those conflicting projects will be requested from other instructors from the course.
<br>Competences A9, B3 and A64 willl be evaluated here.
<br><br>As a general principle, the grade will be unique for the entire group. Exceptionally, especially underperforming students not contributing to the team effort can get a different grade.
100
Other comments on the Evaluation
Final presentations are allowed in Galician, Spanish or English.
Those teams not getting the minimum grade to pass the course will have some additional weeks till the allocated date in the second call to present their work again. If the performance of a given student is graded differently from his/her team-mates, and this leads to failing the course, then he/she will need to show a comprehensive domain of the project developed by his/her team in the second call, together with sufficient additional contributions of his/her own.
